【 RNI-HIN/2013/51580 】
【 RNI-MPHIN/2009/31101 】
05 Jan 2023
Gwalior : The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench recently granted anticipatory bail to a vendor who was alleged to have been selling paneer that was unfit for human consumption.
The bench comprising Justice Atul Sreedharan observed that there was nothing on record to suggest that the customers purchased the paneer under the pretext that the it was pure but later found it to be adulterated-
For the offence of cheating under Section 420 IPC, ingredients of Section 415 of IPC have to be fulfilled. There must be a representation which is false which representation must lead a person to act in a manner which causes him loss or to act in a manner in which he would not have otherwise acted but for the false representation. Prima facie it does not appear to be a case where a customer has purchased the Paneer under the representation that the Paneer is pure and was later found to be adulterated.
Facts of the case were that while inspecting the shop of the Applicant, the Food Inspector seized paneer which was found to be unsafe for human consumption under Section 3(1)(zz) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. He, thus, filed a complaint against the Applicant as required under FSSA. In addition thereto, he also got an FIR registered against the Applicant for offences punishable under Sections 420, 272, 273 IPC. Apprehending his arrest, the Applicant moved the Court.
Applicant submitted before the Court that the said FIR was filed with mala fide intentions. It was further argued that he was alleged to have committed an offence which is specifically mentioned under FSSA, whereby he was exposed to penalty under Section 57(1)(ii). Per contra, the State asserted that the offence of cheating can be made out against an individual selling adulterated food.
Examining the submissions of parties and documents on record, the Court concurred with the submissions put forth by the Applicant. It noted that the ingredients under Section 415 IPC were not fulfilled so as to attract the offence under Section 420 IPC-
The F.I.R. has been registered by the Food Inspector himself. The other sections being Sections 272 and 273 though prima facie applicable in this case are not cognizable and bailable offence. Prima facie, it appears that the act of the applicant can only be proceeded under Section 57 (1) (ii) and Sections 272 and 273 of IPC. Prima facie, ingredients of Section 415 of IPC are not fulfilled in order to make the applicant liable for the offence under Section 420 of IPC.
Accordingly, the application was allowed and the Applicant was extended the benefit of anticipatory bail.
Case Title: BEERBAL DHAKAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Paper slip found in Train’s toilet about bomb in train, stopped at Itarsi junction
नाबालिग़ को अज्ञात अपहरणकर्ता ने किया अगवा, अब तक नही हुआ दस्तयाब!!
One Iranian suspicious couple found in Vidisha, know neither English nor Hindi
शहर में क़ाबिज़ जंगलराज: सरेराह धारदार हथियार से हुआ मर्डर!!
बिना इजाज़त समोसा उठाया तो करदी हत्या !!!
CM unveils Bose’s statue before inauguration of ROB bridge, fireworks light up the sky
Police & District Administration conducts encroachment drive against Abdul Razzaq’s criminal brother in 3 fraud cases
शक के घेरे में जहांगीराबाद पुलिस, देर रात गोलियां चली चाकुओं से हमला हुआ लेकिन टीआई क्यों छुपा रहे ???
Hoshangabad and Rajgarh districts of MP gets new collector
Bhopal Police finally nabs vehicle thief from Bairagarh area who robbed 2 wheeler 5 months ago
Carter dead at 34, millennium’s bubblegum bad boy – and brother of Backstreet Boy's lead
शिवराज ने कमलनाथ को कहा-खेत की मूली, जीतू पटवारी बोले-मान मर्यादा भूले शिवराज
Hawk Forces recover explosives & electronic units from drum after an encounter with maoists in Balaghat’s jungle
Friend runs away with Kirana businessman's luxury car in Lalghati area of the capital
Retired officer’s minor son rams ambulance, had security guard with him; patient dead
Total Visitors :- 384651